Is Wind and Solar Power Safe Alternatives?

Bad for man and bad for the environment. (See more on my site: https://tinyurl.com/n9x27mg) ________________________ ➤ Solar panels create 300 times more toxic waste per unit of energy than do nuclear power plants. ➤ If solar and nuclear produce the…

Is Wind and Solar Power Safe Alternatives?

Source

0
(0)

Bad for man and bad for the environment. (See more on my site: https://tinyurl.com/n9x27mg)
________________________
➤ Solar panels create 300 times more toxic waste per unit of energy than do nuclear power plants.
➤ If solar and nuclear produce the same amount of electricity over the next 25 years that nuclear produced in 2016, and the wastes are stacked on football fields, the nuclear waste would reach the height of the Leaning Tower of Pisa (52 meters), while the solar waste would reach the height of two Mt. Everests (16 km).
➤ In countries like China, India, and Ghana, communities living near e-waste dumps often burn the waste in order to salvage the valuable copper wires for resale. Since this process requires burning off the plastic, the resulting smoke contains toxic fumes that are carcinogenic and teratogenic (birth defect-causing) when inhaled.

SEE: EP (https://tinyurl.com/ybpwgrsc)
ALSO: National Geographic (https://tinyurl.com/yb2ewy74) | IEEE (https://tinyurl.com/y7zjpzuz) | Forbes (https://tinyurl.com/ycho7vo4) | National Review (https://tinyurl.com/y8a4dun7) | WUWT (https://tinyurl.com/ydynqufb)
________________________
This is why Google has given up… here is there statement:

✦ “We came to the conclusion that even if Google and others had led the way toward a wholesale adoption of renewable energy, that switch would not have resulted in significant reductions of carbon dioxide emissions. Trying to combat climate change exclusively with today’s renewable energy technologies simply won’t work; we need a fundamentally different approach…. Even if one were to electrify all of transport, industry, heating and so on, so much renewable generation and balancing/storage equipment would be needed to power it that astronomical new requirements for steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage etc etc would appear. All these things are made using mammoth amounts of energy: far from achieving massive energy savings, which most plans for a renewables future rely on implicitly, we would wind up needing far more energy, which would mean even more vast renewables farms – and even more materials and energy to make and maintain them and so on. The scale of the building would be like nothing ever attempted by the human race.”

0 / 5. 0